|
Critical Evaluation |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Overall Evaluation |
75 |
100 |
|
Appropriateness Lever |
0.8 |
1.0 |
By far the best melodist in the competition. The wind
writing seems particularly idiomatic. I don’t understand why the work is
called ‘Blisters’, though that doesn’t matter. Fires as mischief makers?
Well, If you’d been in a fire you might think otherwise! The work is too
short to make real impact or paint an appropriately fiery tone poem, but
it shows considerable promise nonetheless. I particularly liked the
melancholy mood which gave way to an increasing sense of threat toward
the end of the piece. I would suggest the composer look at Prokofiev’s
method of revising sketched melodies by putting memorable hooks in weak
phrases.
By: wobbie |
Score: 60 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Overall Evaluation |
85 |
100 |
|
Appropriateness Lever |
1.0 |
1.0 |
This was one of
the last entries to be posted and it came as a great relief for me -
here was someone who had understood the question asked and attempted to
take the listener into the picture. There was an exciting beginning with
a good build-up of tension and relaxation, and there was much variety in
the orchestration mirroring the constantly-changing fire. I liked very
much the use of the Chorale-type melody which sounded a bit like “Bist
du bei mir” by Bach, which would have been very appropriate in a fire
situation. The balance between the beginning, middle and ending was well
handled. This was a piece which I could (listen to) again. I think it
could be much better if it was expanded into a real tone poem, but in
the time space used a lot was achieved.
By: Judge No. 1 (See
Notes) |
Score: 85 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
Comments |
|
Complexity |
40 |
50 |
You show a good grasp of
creating interesting orchestral effects without having the music
become tiresome to listen to. The opening catches the listener's
interest and has an mysterious sound to it which, in a way,
prepares the listener for what is to come. I like the dialogue
you have between instruments. You understand how to write
interesting counterpoint as well. I really like the section you
have around 2:12 - your string writing is very beautiful. Your
harmonic progressions were very interesting, which puts your
piece much further ahead than most of the other compositions
submitted. I love the climax, and the ending is suitable for the
theme you are trying to convey. |
|
Orchestration |
20 |
25 |
Your orchestration was
impressive based on what I could hear. You made good choices
overall, and used the instruments well. However, it is quite
difficult to evaluate this objectively without the score. |
|
Composition |
20 |
25 |
Overall, you know what you
are doing, and any flaws that there might be in your music will
disappear with time. The thing that I really liked about this
piece is that it wasn't boring - I would listen to it again in
the future. To me, that is quite an accomplishment. Keep
composing! |
|
Relevance |
1.0 |
1.0 |
It was very well written. I
could really visualize the forest and the flames. |
By: Judge No. 2 |
Score: 80 |
|
Peer Evaluation |
General
-
Complexity - There is so
much within this song. Not too complex, nor too simple.
         
-
Instrumentation - The
orchestra throughout the song was beautifully used. Not much else to
say.
              
-
Composition - I loved the
pizzicato strings. It helped give me the feeling of the forest. The
melody was very efficient, while not giving off too much, (and) the
harmonics really gave the way for the melody.
              
-
Initial Inspiration -
This is where the the score may seem awkward. I feel the song
is a bit more mysterious, rather than dramatic. I feel the forest,
as it has more mystery within those woods rather than chaos. I hear
the chaos, but I do feel the arcane overplayed it, but it was nicely
interpreted.
              
              
Specifics
-
Opening - Wonderful
opening. Nicely done (as to) how it leads the way for the rest of
the song
    
-
Middle - Great way to
keep the listener interested. This song is composed very generously,
giving the listener a true orchestral song.
         
-
Ending - The ending is
very climactic. I felt the strength of the orchestra right here, and
it will continue to be remembered within me.
              
I have high hopes for this song, and the composer.
This is one song that gets me jealous. Good work!
From the composer of:
Abysmal Flames |
Score: 87 |
|
From the composer of:
Affordable Wisdom |
Score: 60 |
Overall this piece has the potential to be a very nice music but there's
several things I didn't like. The music is too slow for me for several
parts, and slow=boring (1:55 starting) . There are some parts which
could be very appealing, but sadly something kills the music later on,
e.g..
- (At 1:15-1:20) It ends with a detached note, kills the mood of
the music. It is a bad transition used here.
- (Around 2:32) There is a pause down there, which I don't know
why. Also there should be more development on the melodies here. The
transition to the next section was too fast.
- 2:50 onwards - The mood here should be more dramatic. better
orchestration should be used if this part of the music was to be
more appealing
- 3:10 onwards - Again here better orchestration should be used.
It was kind of too thick for me when the repeated notes were played.
Not too ear pleasing at all.
I do, however like the chord progressions that is used at the slow
parts. Very nicely used at the right notes. The solo melody at the start
could be more outstanding in terms of orchestration and dynamics. It
sounded nice but it wasn't too impressive at all for a first impression.
Perhaps the accompaniment was too soft and that was the reason why.
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Complexity |
13 |
15 |
|
Orchestration |
9 |
15 |
|
Composition |
11 |
15 |
|
Appropriateness |
17 |
20 |
|
Beginning/Start |
4 |
5 |
|
Middle/Climax |
4 |
5 |
|
Ending |
3 |
5 |
|
Overall Opinion |
16 |
20 |
Bonus/Malus
Very nice flowing melody at the start |
+2 |
From the composer of:
Fate of the Forest |
Score: 79 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
Comments |
|
Complexity |
17 |
20 |
Most of the time you stick to the melody
and a simple accompaniment figure, which is perfectly adequate,
but I would have liked to hear a little more in the way of
countermelody, or some more motion in the accompaniment, at
times. |
|
Orchestration |
17 |
20 |
Tying into what I said about complexity,
the orchestration could use some more moving parts. |
|
Beginning |
5 |
5 |
Absolutely gorgeous beginning. The melody
indicates both serenity and underpinnings of danger - extremely
effective |
|
Middle |
4 |
5 |
After the big transition chord (which is
abrupt, but extremely effective), the "fire" melody seems a
little bland compared to the wonderful tune that came before it.
Nonetheless, once it hits the climax, it's a powerful movement |
|
Ending |
5 |
5 |
The soft bit at 2:12 is such a wonderfully
chilling moment. It's totally unlike anything else in the piece,
harmonically and texturally - which makes the gradual shift back
to the more classical harmony of the beginning for the big
shattering finale all the more brilliant |
|
Overall Composition Quality |
22 |
25 |
I'm really impressed by the motivic
thought you put into this. I really appreciate the way you
introduce the motives early and allow them to transform over the
course of the piece, rather than simply slapping the exact same
arrangement onto the piece over and over. |
|
Appropriateness |
19 |
20 |
The music evokes the situation really
well. As you said, there's not much violence, but your
interpretation of the picture makes perfect sense. |
From the composer of:
Forest Fire: A Brief
Tone Poem for Orchestra |
Score: 89 |
|
The use of pizzicato strings and flute at the beginning
painted an ideal picture of a forest. The shift from playful to dramatic
was smooth and seamless. The dramatic strings may have gone on a little
longer than necessary, but I thoroughly enjoyed the interaction between
instruments. The brass at the end was a great touch and capped the mood
on an already somber scene. While it’s true it leans toward the dramatic
side than one of violence, it does this effectively and captures the
emotion behind the destruction without sounding like your standard “sad
and mournful” music.
It sounds like the composer has a good grasp of
orchestration, counterpoint, and melody. As I mentioned earlier, the
constant interaction of instruments made the piece enjoyable to listen
to without getting bored at any point. One of my major complaints is
that with such a command of the orchestra that the composer clearly has,
I was waiting for it to explode into frenetic fury. Perhaps this
expectation is one of the things that kept me listening until the very
end.
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Overall Evaluation |
95 |
100 |
|
Appropriateness Lever |
0.9 |
1.0 |
From the composer of:
Inferno |
Score: 86 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
Comments |
|
Setting |
8 |
10 |
Excellent way of creating
a mood here, even though a little video-gamey and somewhat
trite. I felt the surrounding mood. |
|
Composition |
6 |
10 |
Pretty much standard for a
large orchestral sound. Drama and intensity, with a shade of
cheesy sadness. |
|
Orchestration |
5 |
10 |
Rather common. Too much
use of strings and horns for melody, not enough variation
between the instruments. |
|
Overall Score |
6 |
10 |
Rather over-dramatic and
kind of corny at times. |
From the composer of:
Music for Trumpet and
Strings |
Score: 63 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Overall Evaluation |
90 |
100 |
|
Appropriateness Lever |
1.0 |
1.0 |
From the composer of:
Of Desperation,
Death, and Hope |
Score: 90 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
Comments |
|
Relevance |
8.5 |
10 |
Ah,
finally a song where I can feel the relevance. This is good – if
I wasn’t given the explanation I would still see the relevance
but it being given enhanced the piece. I liked the beginning,
and I liked the use of the two ‘themes’. This succeeded in
becoming a nice tone poem for orchestra. I liked the explanation
and I enjoyed the way the picture was conveyed. Bravo. |
|
Orchestration |
8.5 |
10 |
This was exceptionally done for the style
it is written in. I was reminded of movie music, which is
probably a good thing. It felt as if all the instruments were
performing in their capabilities – however, I cannot be sure of
this without a score. I would suggest that the composer learn to
use a notation program, because their work is quite good so far.
While it is nothing complex, this is quite nice. The soaring
horn over the strings is classic but always gets a rise. I like
the wind flourishes on top of everything, bravo. The use of harp
is classic. The moment at 1:16 is SUPERB – keep this type of
contrast in your work. Tremolo strings well used. Good job at
passing the work through the winds. At 1:45 I was a bit confused
as to which instruments were which, and it sounded difficult.
The composer is quite good at evoking moods. While the
composition is nothing very complex, it is similar to film music
and quite exceptional in that respect. BRAVO. |
|
Overall Effect |
17 |
20 |
Most of what I think has been said
already. I would advise the composer to begin using notation
programs. The only part of the piece I didn’t feel was quite up
was the ending. Otherwise I was very impressed. |
From the composer of:
Prelude for Solo
Piano |
Score: 85 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Complexity |
10 |
15 |
|
Orchestration |
12 |
15 |
|
Composition |
12 |
15 |
|
Appropriateness |
15 |
20 |
|
Beginning |
4 |
5 |
|
Middle/Climax |
4 |
5 |
|
Ending |
5 |
5 |
|
Overall Opinion |
15 |
20 |
|
Bonus/Malus |
none given |
From the composer of:
Tell Me About The
Forest |
Score: 77 |
Technical Elements [40/60]:
- Harmony: Simple but well done. You adopt a
tonal/contrapuntal type language and you maintain this consistently
through the piece. The first theme was very interesting as you
explored many key areas and did not come to rest until the beginning
of the second theme. The use of modal mixture i.e. Major triads
switching to the parallel minor was also a nice addition. The one
thing I found unconvincing was how your second theme is entirely in
F minor. You briefly venture into a couple of different tonal areas
but you never actually formally modulate at any part during this
part of the piece. This results in the work feeling tonally
stagnant.
- Development: I liked how you used the same
material throughout the piece and how you used some more advanced
techniques such as imitation and counterpoint. The counter melodies
were also nice. That being said, development can be much more
interesting when you (vary) your ideas more. Your direct imitative
section worked well only because of your application of timbral
color. There was also a transition section when all of your
instruments move in unidirectional motion. I felt this was
really the weakest moment in the piece. Conversely, your transition
at
1:12 from your first theme to your second one was very strong and
interesting.
- Orchestration: Overall, you use the
strings like a synth pad. Strings are capable of playing much more
than this and I find it odd how you have the brass section more
active than the strings at point. Strings are a highly virtuosic
choir within the orchestra and more often than not should be treated
as such. Near the end of the piece perhaps tremolos or a more active
texture in this choir would have been a stronger choice.
- Form: You make a good use of a binary form
with a rounded binary form in which you express your first theme as
a quasi movement structure in Bb minor and you transition into your
second section which is through
composed and exists in F minor. This use of form is effective and
makes
for an interesting piece of music which climaxes near the end,
making
for an effective depiction of a catastrophic event.
- Overall, your writing style is still young
and your technical ability is that of someone who is still beginning
his craft. However, you make the piece work in spite of these
limitations. Good job.
Musicality [16/20]:
- The piece is simply beautiful, and works well for
what it is.
Relevance [20/20]:
- Arguably one of the most relevant works here
because of the strong cinematic influence. You did what you set out
to do, congratulations.
Overall Thoughts [B+ / Very Good]. This piece is simply
beautiful. There is not a dull moment anywhere throughout the work and
the material just flows from beginning to end. The mood very accurately
depicts a tragic event and would make for an excellent film score. You have every right to be proud of this work.
From the composer of:
The Dance of the
Clumsy Bear |
Score: 76 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
Comments |
|
Overall Evaluation |
80 |
100 |
Composition is nice;
Orchestration nearly perfect. |
|
Appropriateness Lever |
0.9 |
1.0 |
The intention is very
clear. |
From the composer of:
The Wildfire Suite |
Score: 72 |