Blisters
Back Home Next

Composed by: Simon Benit

Length: 3:41

     
Composer's Notes My first intention when making this piece, was to emphasize the suffering roll of the forest, rather than showing the destructive might of the fire. While it's true my composition clings more to the dramatic than the violent side, both 'moods' are clearly apparent.

The listener gets introduced to the forest-theme by just pizzicato strings and a flute, but eventually other instruments join them to paint the forest's ambience with more colors. The mischievous fire-theme gets introduced after a rather abrupt, and possibly unexpected, change of mood.

The fire, which brings nothing more than death and destruction leads us to a rather sad toned part, ending in a climax where both elements of the forest-theme as well as the fire-theme are apparent. The piece concludes with a contrast of high strings playing 6 notes of a 'variation' on the forest-theme, while being supported by a monotonous brass party, blowing the final minor chord. It's not a happy ending, but I don't think the picture got one either. :(

Peer Review Notes For Judging, I used Musharraf's judging system:
Criterion Pts.
Complexity 15
Orchestration 15
Composition 15
Appropriateness 20
Beginning 5
Middle/Climax 5
Ending 5
Overall Opinion 20
Bonus/Malus (+/-)  
TOTAL 100
Critical Evaluation
Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 75 100
Appropriateness Lever 0.8 1.0

By far the best melodist in the competition. The wind writing seems particularly idiomatic. I don’t understand why the work is called ‘Blisters’, though that doesn’t matter. Fires as mischief makers? Well, If you’d been in a fire you might think otherwise! The work is too short to make real impact or paint an appropriately fiery tone poem, but it shows considerable promise nonetheless. I particularly liked the melancholy mood which gave way to an increasing sense of threat toward the end of the piece. I would suggest the composer look at Prokofiev’s method of revising sketched melodies by putting memorable hooks in weak phrases.

By: wobbie

Score: 60
Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 85 100
Appropriateness Lever 1.0 1.0

This was one of the last entries to be posted and it came as a great relief for me - here was someone who had understood the question asked and attempted to take the listener into the picture. There was an exciting beginning with a good build-up of tension and relaxation, and there was much variety in the orchestration mirroring the constantly-changing fire. I liked very much the use of the Chorale-type melody which sounded a bit like “Bist du bei mir” by Bach, which would have been very appropriate in a fire situation. The balance between the beginning, middle and ending was well handled. This was a piece which I could (listen to) again. I think it could be much better if it was expanded into a real tone poem, but in the time space used a lot was achieved.

By: Judge No. 1 (See Notes)

Score: 85
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Complexity 40 50

You show a good grasp of creating interesting orchestral effects without having the music become tiresome to listen to. The opening catches the listener's interest and has an mysterious sound to it which, in a way, prepares the listener for what is to come. I like the dialogue you have between instruments. You understand how to write interesting counterpoint as well. I really like the section you have around 2:12 - your string writing is very beautiful. Your harmonic progressions were very interesting, which puts your piece much further ahead than most of the other compositions submitted. I love the climax, and the ending is suitable for the theme you are trying to convey.

Orchestration 20 25 Your orchestration was impressive based on what I could hear. You made good choices overall, and used the instruments well. However, it is quite difficult to evaluate this objectively without the score.
Composition 20 25

Overall, you know what you are doing, and any flaws that there might be in your music will disappear with time. The thing that I really liked about this piece is that it wasn't boring - I would listen to it again in the future. To me, that is quite an accomplishment. Keep composing!

Relevance 1.0 1.0 It was very well written. I could really visualize the forest and the flames.

By: Judge No. 2

Score: 80
Peer Evaluation

General

  1. Complexity - There is so much within this song. Not too complex, nor too simple.

  2. Instrumentation - The orchestra throughout the song was beautifully used. Not much else to say.

  3. Composition - I loved the pizzicato strings. It helped give me the feeling of the forest. The melody was very efficient, while not giving off too much, (and) the harmonics really gave the way for the melody.

  4. Initial Inspiration - This is where the the score may seem awkward.  I feel the song is a bit more mysterious, rather than dramatic. I feel the forest, as it has more mystery within those woods rather than chaos. I hear the chaos, but I do feel the arcane overplayed it, but it was nicely interpreted.

Specifics

  1. Opening - Wonderful opening. Nicely done (as to) how it leads the way for the rest of the song

  2. Middle - Great way to keep the listener interested. This song is composed very generously, giving the listener a true orchestral song.

  3. Ending - The ending is very climactic. I felt the strength of the orchestra right here, and it will continue to be remembered within me.

I have high hopes for this song, and the composer. This is one song that gets me jealous. Good work!

From the composer of: Abysmal Flames

Score: 87

From the composer of: Affordable Wisdom

Score: 60
Overall this piece has the potential to be a very nice music but there's several things I didn't like. The music is too slow for me for several parts, and slow=boring (1:55 starting) . There are some parts which could be very appealing, but sadly something kills the music later on, e.g..
  • (At 1:15-1:20) It ends with a detached note, kills the mood of the music. It is a bad transition used here.
  • (Around 2:32) There is a pause down there, which I don't know why. Also there should be more development on the melodies here. The transition to the next section was too fast.
  • 2:50 onwards - The mood here should be more dramatic. better orchestration should be used if this part of the music was to be more appealing
  • 3:10 onwards - Again here better orchestration should be used. It was kind of too thick for me when the repeated notes were played. Not too ear pleasing at all.

I do, however like the chord progressions that is used at the slow parts. Very nicely used at the right notes. The solo melody at the start could be more outstanding in terms of orchestration and dynamics. It sounded nice but it wasn't too impressive at all for a first impression. Perhaps the accompaniment was too soft and that was the reason why.

Criterion Pts. Total
Complexity 13 15
Orchestration 9 15
Composition 11 15
Appropriateness 17 20
Beginning/Start 4 5
Middle/Climax 4 5
Ending 3 5
Overall Opinion 16 20
Bonus/Malus
Very nice flowing melody at the start

+2

From the composer of: Fate of the Forest

Score: 79
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Complexity 17 20 Most of the time you stick to the melody and a simple accompaniment figure, which is perfectly adequate, but I would have liked to hear a little more in the way of countermelody, or some more motion in the accompaniment, at times.
Orchestration 17 20 Tying into what I said about complexity, the orchestration could use some more moving parts.
Beginning 5 5 Absolutely gorgeous beginning. The melody indicates both serenity and underpinnings of danger - extremely effective
Middle 4 5 After the big transition chord (which is abrupt, but extremely effective), the "fire" melody seems a little bland compared to the wonderful tune that came before it. Nonetheless, once it hits the climax, it's a powerful movement
Ending 5 5 The soft bit at 2:12 is such a wonderfully chilling moment. It's totally unlike anything else in the piece, harmonically and texturally - which makes the gradual shift back to the more classical harmony of the beginning for the big shattering finale all the more brilliant
Overall Composition Quality 22 25 I'm really impressed by the motivic thought you put into this. I really appreciate the way you introduce the motives early and allow them to transform over the course of the piece, rather than simply slapping the exact same arrangement onto the piece over and over.
Appropriateness 19 20 The music evokes the situation really well. As you said, there's not much violence, but your interpretation of the picture makes perfect sense.

From the composer of: Forest Fire: A Brief Tone Poem for Orchestra

Score: 89
The use of pizzicato strings and flute at the beginning painted an ideal picture of a forest. The shift from playful to dramatic was smooth and seamless. The dramatic strings may have gone on a little longer than necessary, but I thoroughly enjoyed the interaction between instruments. The brass at the end was a great touch and capped the mood on an already somber scene. While it’s true it leans toward the dramatic side than one of violence, it does this effectively and captures the emotion behind the destruction without sounding like your standard “sad and mournful” music.

It sounds like the composer has a good grasp of orchestration, counterpoint, and melody. As I mentioned earlier, the constant interaction of instruments made the piece enjoyable to listen to without getting bored at any point. One of my major complaints is that with such a command of the orchestra that the composer clearly has, I was waiting for it to explode into frenetic fury. Perhaps this expectation is one of the things that kept me listening until the very end.

Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 95 100
Appropriateness Lever 0.9 1.0

From the composer of: Inferno

Score: 86
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Setting 8 10

Excellent way of creating a mood here, even though a little video-gamey and somewhat trite. I felt the surrounding mood.

Composition 6 10

Pretty much standard for a large orchestral sound. Drama and intensity, with a shade of cheesy sadness.

Orchestration 5 10

Rather common. Too much use of strings and horns for melody, not enough variation between the instruments.

Overall Score 6 10

Rather over-dramatic and kind of corny at times.

From the composer of: Music for Trumpet and Strings

Score: 63
Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 90 100
Appropriateness Lever 1.0 1.0

From the composer of: Of Desperation, Death, and Hope

Score: 90
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Relevance 8.5 10

Ah, finally a song where I can feel the relevance. This is good – if I wasn’t given the explanation I would still see the relevance but it being given enhanced the piece. I liked the beginning, and I liked the use of the two ‘themes’. This succeeded in becoming a nice tone poem for orchestra. I liked the explanation and I enjoyed the way the picture was conveyed. Bravo.

Orchestration 8.5 10 This was exceptionally done for the style it is written in. I was reminded of movie music, which is probably a good thing. It felt as if all the instruments were performing in their capabilities – however, I cannot be sure of this without a score. I would suggest that the composer learn to use a notation program, because their work is quite good so far. While it is nothing complex, this is quite nice. The soaring horn over the strings is classic but always gets a rise. I like the wind flourishes on top of everything, bravo. The use of harp is classic. The moment at 1:16 is SUPERB – keep this type of contrast in your work. Tremolo strings well used. Good job at passing the work through the winds. At 1:45 I was a bit confused as to which instruments were which, and it sounded difficult. The composer is quite good at evoking moods. While the composition is nothing very complex, it is similar to film music and quite exceptional in that respect. BRAVO.
Overall Effect 17 20 Most of what I think has been said already. I would advise the composer to begin using notation programs. The only part of the piece I didn’t feel was quite up was the ending. Otherwise I was very impressed.

From the composer of: Prelude for Solo Piano

Score: 85
Criterion Pts. Total
Complexity 10 15
Orchestration 12 15
Composition 12 15
Appropriateness 15 20
Beginning 4 5
Middle/Climax 4 5
Ending 5 5
Overall Opinion 15 20
Bonus/Malus none given

From the composer of: Tell Me About The Forest

Score: 77
Technical Elements [40/60]:
  • Harmony: Simple but well done. You adopt a tonal/contrapuntal type language and you maintain this consistently through the piece. The first theme was very interesting as you explored many key areas and did not come to rest until the beginning of the second theme. The use of modal mixture i.e. Major triads switching to the parallel minor was also a nice addition. The one thing I found unconvincing was how your second theme is entirely in F minor. You briefly venture into a couple of different tonal areas but you never actually formally modulate at any part during this part of the piece. This results in the work feeling tonally stagnant.
  • Development: I liked how you used the same material throughout the piece and how you used some more advanced techniques such as imitation and counterpoint. The counter melodies were also nice. That being said, development can be much more interesting when you (vary) your ideas more. Your direct imitative section worked well only because of your application of timbral color. There was also a transition section when all of your instruments move in unidirectional motion. I felt this was
    really the weakest moment in the piece. Conversely, your transition at
    1:12 from your first theme to your second one was very strong and
    interesting.
  • Orchestration: Overall, you use the strings like a synth pad. Strings are capable of playing much more than this and I find it odd how you have the brass section more active than the strings at point. Strings are a highly virtuosic choir within the orchestra and more often than not should be treated as such. Near the end of the piece perhaps tremolos or a more active texture in this choir would have been a stronger choice.
  • Form: You make a good use of a binary form with a rounded binary form in which you express your first theme as a quasi movement structure in Bb minor and you transition into your second section which is through composed and exists in F minor. This use of form is effective and makes for an interesting piece of music which climaxes near the end, making for an effective depiction of a catastrophic event.
  • Overall, your writing style is still young and your technical ability is that of someone who is still beginning his craft. However, you make the piece work in spite of these limitations. Good job.

Musicality [16/20]:

  • The piece is simply beautiful, and works well for what it is.

Relevance [20/20]:

  • Arguably one of the most relevant works here because of the strong cinematic influence. You did what you set out to do, congratulations.

Overall Thoughts [B+ / Very Good]. This piece is simply beautiful. There is not a dull moment anywhere throughout the work and the material just flows from beginning to end. The mood very accurately depicts a tragic event and would make for an excellent film score.  You have every right to be proud of this work.

From the composer of: The Dance of the Clumsy Bear

Score: 76
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Overall Evaluation 80 100

Composition is nice; Orchestration nearly perfect.

Appropriateness Lever 0.9 1.0

The intention is very clear.

From the composer of: The Wildfire Suite

Score: 72

You will need to install the free Sibelius Scorch plugin to view Sibelius files.

Back Home Next

from 04/29/2008

© 2005-2006 by ZergrinchAll mistakes and omissions are belong to me.