|
Critical Evaluation |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Overall Evaluation |
80 |
100 |
|
Appropriateness Lever |
0.85 |
1.0 |
The writing for strings and trumpet are heading in the direction of
Ernest Bloch and Shostakovich, which the composer should have a look at.
It’s a fairly naïve and simple piece, and I mean that in a positive way.
They can be hard qualities to achieve, but the overall effect is a
little grey in colour. The programmatic content works well, even though
the thematic content is a little pale, at least it’s not obsessively
tonal, which shows a mild sense of adventurousness. Good work. By: wobbie |
Score: 68 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Overall Evaluation |
60 |
100 |
|
Appropriateness Lever |
0.6 |
1.0 |
The slow beginning was fine, but
took too long to start burning the forest. I think the fire
service would have had it out in seconds. The fire here took a back seat
to the programme which I thought very weak in itself, deviating from the
picture, the deer are not so important as the fire. The result was too
static, both in tempo and mood, the deer seemed to walk away from the
scene when in reality they would have run away at top speed. Animals
understand well enough the dangers of fire. The music is pleasant enough
to listen to but ultimately unsatisfying.
By: Judge No. 1 (See Notes) |
Score: 36 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
Comments |
|
Complexity |
40 |
50 |
I liked the originality of your
harmonies. The dissonances set the atmosphere without making the
music hard to listen to. I liked your various effects in the
strings (pizzicato and such), because you used them in the
"right places". I liked your creative use of articulation in
certain parts - they gave the music "flavor". However, my main
complaint is about your melodies - they include a lot of
syncopation that I felt got tiresome in parts. Also, it appears
to me that you basically always have the trumpet playing melody
- why not give it a bit more variety? Even simple ideas like
whole/half notes playing a slow countermelody below the strings,
or even a fanfare above the strings while the first violin plays
melody would make your writing much more interesting. |
|
Orchestration |
15 |
25 |
Thank you for submitting a score.
Your writing for the strings was interesting and had a lot of
variety - read my comments above about the trumpet. |
|
Composition |
15 |
25 |
I didn't find the melodies very
"memorable", but that isn't necessarily important in the scheme
of things. It's what you do with them that counts, and you
certainly painted a lot of very interesting imagery through the
combination of your melodies and accompaniments. However, I
think you should develop specific ideas more closely, just to
give the work a stronger feel of cohesiveness. |
|
Relevance |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Completely relevant to the theme
- went above and beyond in portraying the picture given. |
By: Judge No. 2 |
Score: 70 |
|
Peer Evaluation |
General
-
Complexity -
Interesting use of complexity. Can't say much there. It sounds a lot
different from the actual score, so I don't know what to grade by,
however, I did like the MIDI much more.
         
-
Instrumentation -
The
instruments used for each part made the song sound very strange. I
can't say I enjoyed it much, however, each instrument you used
sounds unique, but that may be the soundfont.
              
-
Composition -
I am a
bit lost at this point. I can hear each instrument harmonizing, but
it didn't seem to flow well for me.
              
-
Initial
Inspiration -
The song has a
very eerie feeling to it. Like 'what is going on?' - I like that.
When I first saw the picture, I thought to myself 'what is going
on?' as well.
              
              
Specifics
-
Opening -
As it
begins, I can already hear the eerie scene. Indeed strange.
    
-
Middle -
I don't
know about this. I don't really know what to say, but it didn't
spark my interest.
         
-
Ending -
As I
was listening to the song, I had the whole song in repeat, but when
it ended, the beginning played again, and I thought 'Is it supposed
to continue?' I looked at the song and realized that the song had
just ended. I don't see an ending.
              
I can't say I
liked it, but it is a very unique.
From the composer of:
Abysmal Flames |
Score: 59 |
|
From the composer of:
Affordable Wisdom |
Score: 80 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
Comments |
|
Complexity |
11 |
15 |
Without taking too much
notion of the (not always very fitting, I might add)
description, I can say I was pretty impressed by this work. Its
‘chaos’ was very appropriate and fitting to the theme and had an
original approach as well: not the usual “Fear the mighty fire”
approach, or the “Oh no! What about the poor forest?” approach,
but more a paranoid “Who did this to us?!” approach, which did
not seemed to fit any less than the formed ones. A downside
might be the fairly straightforward use of the limited
instruments used (for example no Pizzicato / Spiccato strings). |
|
Orchestration |
5 |
15 |
|
Composition |
10 |
15 |
|
Appropriateness |
17 |
20 |
|
Beginning/Start |
4 |
5 |
|
Middle/Climax |
4 |
5 |
|
Ending |
4 |
5 |
|
Overall Opinion |
15 |
20 |
|
Bonus/Malus |
none given |
|
From the composer of:
Blisters |
Score: 70 |
Firstly the title, I might have chosen a more appealing title if it were
me. I thought this combination of trumpets and strings will not
sound well at all, and indeed it didn't. I would prefer this for a full
orchestra production instead.
Discords are not suspenseful enough, with the exception of the
introduction and (3:10 starting)
Introduction - a very consistently slow rhythm with little modification
= static/boring which kills the music
until 2:20 min and beyond - not very ear-pleasing at all. Very static
still
Around 3 min - somewhat nice melody for a few seconds but was kinda
screwed later.
5:50 onwards - A more nicer sounding solo instrument is preferred.
The bass line at the end of the piece is annoying. Again here, a better
accompaniment is preferred.
Overall, I gradually lost interest in hearing as the piece was
progressing till the end. I would definitely say this not among the best
out of the 12.
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Complexity |
9 |
15 |
|
Orchestration |
8 |
15 |
|
Composition |
6 |
15 |
|
Appropriateness |
13 |
20 |
|
Beginning/Start |
4 |
5 |
|
Middle/Climax |
2 |
5 |
|
Ending |
1 |
5 |
|
Overall Opinion |
12 |
20 |
Bonus/Malus
Uninteresting piece |
-3 |
From the composer of: Fate of the Forest |
Score: 52 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
Comments |
|
Complexity |
16 |
20 |
At times, the harmonies you use are really
nice, but (during) the second half of the piece, you get too
bogged down (in) atonal "sludge," and it stops being enjoyable
to listen to. |
|
Orchestration |
13 |
20 |
You stick faithfully to the typical melody
+ accompaniment setup, with the melody always (with) the trumpet
or first violins. |
|
Beginning |
5 |
5 |
I really enjoy how the beginning sounds so
peaceful and yet foreboding at the same time. |
|
Middle |
3 |
5 |
The section which begins at 2:30 is
gorgeous, but why suddenly start implying tonal progressions
after the fire's been discovered? And the weird shift to a
pop/rock style is jarring and doesn't make sense musically. |
|
Ending |
1 |
5 |
Once the aforementioned "pop section"
ends, there's really not anything left to the piece except for a
few ambient melody lines. |
|
Overall Composition Quality |
20 |
25 |
|
|
Appropriateness |
14 |
20 |
To be honest, I find your program
baffling. The beginning sets an appropriate mood, yes. But why
does this beautiful trumpet melody start playing when they're
searching for someone to blame for the fire? Why does the music
only become convincingly agitated once the deer leave the fire
behind at the end? You seem to be playing up some weird
psychological undercurrent, and I don't think that's wholly
kosher, based on the picture. |
From the composer of:
Forest Fire: A Brief
Tone Poem for Orchestra |
Score: 72 |
|
I enjoyed the smaller instrumentation for this
piece, although I wish the strings would have had a more prominent
role. I would have liked to hear the strings provide more than just
chords underneath the trumpet. I don’t recall hearing a main motif. In
a way this piece almost sounds atonal, in that I hear no emphasized
pitch over any others. The use of pizzicato was an effective contrast.
The supplied program was more (of) a hindrance to
my listening experience than it was an aid. While a general description
of what the music is conveying is fine, the marking of specific times in
the music that correspond to events is not something I agree with. In
my opinion, programs help the music express its meaning, instead of the
music doing so by itself. I feel the music should be able to do this
without the need of a program. I believe if the program were not
present I would not have been able to connect this music with a forest.
As it was, even with the program telling me exactly
what to listen for, I failed to make this connection. I heard no fire,
and I had difficulty being convinced that this music portrayed the
thoughts of the animals seeing their home destroyed.
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Overall Evaluation |
75 |
100 |
|
Appropriateness Lever |
0.6 |
1.0 |
From the composer of:
Inferno |
Score: 45 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Overall Evaluation |
83 |
100 |
|
Appropriateness Lever |
1.0 |
1.0 |
From the composer of:
Of Desperation,
Death, and Hope |
Score: 83 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
Comments |
|
Relevance |
8 |
10 |
Fairly
relevant. The program notes, while quite annoying, did help
identify. Funny though how the most relevant part was in the
part about “was it teenagers?” not “what a huge fire?”. In
general it lacked the kind of chaos I’d expect in a fire – I
could see your reasoning so I didn’t dock, but I feel that the
overall feel was missed in places. Your notes really didn’t make
sense at points with the music – especially the end. I didn’t
see how the end was really relevant, but I suppose that is up to
the composer. |
|
Orchestration |
8.5 |
10 |
Quite well done. It is clear that the
composer knows what he is doing with strings and trumpet. At
times it felt as if the strings got a little bit difficult in
their parts, but overall well done. I question the use of a solo
in the beginning violin – I’m not sure It’d cut over the p-level
strings, I would switch those to a pp or change the solo
to mp. Still, not much to say here – a solid job. Well
done. |
|
Overall Effect |
16.5 |
20 |
While impressive, I didn’t really feel
this piece. Something about the program notes rubbed me the
wrong way to begin, and then I felt that sometimes the author
was stretching to make the piece relevant. The composition was
good but nothing stuck with me afterward – this is personal
preference speaking, though. It is obvious that the composer is
skilled in their work. I feel they should work on their form in
the piece – try to get the highs higher – the lows were low
enough. If that makes sense, good. A job well done. |
From the composer of:
Prelude for Solo
Piano |
Score: 88 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
|
Complexity |
10 |
15 |
|
Orchestration |
9 |
15 |
|
Composition |
8 |
15 |
|
Appropriateness |
12 |
20 |
|
Beginning |
2 |
5 |
|
Middle/Climax |
2 |
5 |
|
Ending |
2 |
5 |
|
Overall Opinion |
10 |
20 |
|
Bonus/Malus |
none given |
From the composer of: Tell Me About The
Forest |
Score: 55 |
Technical Elements [48/60]:
-
Harmony: Very good. This is the strongest element of your
compositional style. I appreciated the melancholic feel of this
piece. I really hear a strong influence by composers such as
Prokofiev and Shostakovich.
-
Development: Well, there was some reuse of ideas and a
noticeable
feel in terms of continuity. Still, I didn’t notice a conscious
effort to develop the material within the work. I did particularly
enjoy the effective transitions. There is potential here.
-
Orchestration: Good job actually writing for real instruments.
You were one of the few composers who did. Overall, you didn’t make
use of all the coloristic capabilities of your ensemble, but the
writing looked to be idiomatic especially with the lyric melodies
for (the) trumpet. Your player didn’t have much trouble playing the
lines.
-
Form: The idea of following a program is nice. Overall, the mood
of the piece doesn’t change enough to reflect the varied moods
specified by the program. Still, having the tempo changes was a very
nice idea.
Musicality [10/20]:
-
There are some interesting things that happen but overall, the piece
is lacking in content.
Relevance [15/20]:
-
The program is directly related to the theme of the picture, but the
mood isn’t quite as chaotic as what might be expected.
Overall Thoughts [B / Good]. The piece works on
a formal and harmonic level but it lacks ideas. Your ideas aren’t
strong, i.e. the melodic content isn’t particularly interesting or
strong. The shapes tend to be a bit flat. If you had spent more time
coming up with good ideas rather than rush composing at the last minute,
you may (have been) able to come up with something that would surprise
you and everybody else. For what it’s worth, this piece turned out well.
From the composer of:
The Dance of the
Clumsy Bear |
Score: 73 |
|
Criterion |
Pts. |
Total |
Comments |
|
Overall Evaluation |
60 |
100 |
Sounds too unstructured to
me; orchestration is not the best. |
|
Appropriateness Lever |
0.6 |
1.0 |
I haven't the
"fire"-feeling, which I have had in other pieces. |
From the composer of: The Wildfire Suite |
Score: 36 |