Music for Trumpet and Strings
Back Home Next

Composed by: Nicholas Werner

Length: 5:38

 
Composer's Notes (The piece is Program Music, so I will layout the situation - this is in the Sibelius file)
 
0:00 : Two deer walk alongside a river in familiar territory.
0:47 : They smell smoke. Is it a fire?
1:25 : Something's burning! Could it be the forest they call their home?
1:41 : They come across this fire, which has engulfed their home. They stick close to the water.
2:17 : Who could have done such a thing? It's such a large fire...
3:02 : Was it a group of teenagers? It couldn't have been an accident!
3:17 : Why would anyone do this, if it was not an accident?
3:47 : The fire has engulfed the whole forest. It is so pretty in such a dark way...
4:20 : The deer wonder where they and their family will live, now that their home has been destroyed.
4:45 : They turn back along the river, afraid of the fire.
4:59 : They search for a new home.
Peer Review Notes Structure for scoring:
  • Setting (Is the picture well-represented?) 1-10
  • Composition (Is the piece original and interesting?) 1-10
  • Orchestration (How well crafted is the piece, technically?) 1-10
  • Anything else?
  • Overall Score, 1-10

Final Score, average of all four numbers, multiplied by 10.

Critical Evaluation
Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 80 100
Appropriateness Lever 0.85 1.0

The writing for strings and trumpet are heading in the direction of Ernest Bloch and Shostakovich, which the composer should have a look at. It’s a fairly naïve and simple piece, and I mean that in a positive way. They can be hard qualities to achieve, but the overall effect is a little grey in colour. The programmatic content works well, even though the thematic content is a little pale, at least it’s not obsessively tonal, which shows a mild sense of adventurousness. Good work.

By: wobbie

Score: 68
Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 60 100
Appropriateness Lever 0.6 1.0

The slow beginning was fine, but took too long to start burning the forest.  I think the fire service would have had it out in seconds. The fire here took a back seat to the programme which I thought very weak in itself, deviating from the picture, the deer are not so important as the fire. The result was too static, both in tempo and mood, the deer seemed to walk away from the scene when in reality they would have run away at top speed. Animals understand well enough the dangers of fire. The music is pleasant enough to listen to but ultimately unsatisfying.

By: Judge No. 1 (See Notes)

Score: 36
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Complexity 40 50

I liked the originality of your harmonies. The dissonances set the atmosphere without making the music hard to listen to. I liked your various effects in the strings (pizzicato and such), because you used them in the "right places". I liked your creative use of articulation in certain parts - they gave the music "flavor". However, my main complaint is about your melodies - they include a lot of syncopation that I felt got tiresome in parts. Also, it appears to me that you basically always have the trumpet playing melody - why not give it a bit more variety? Even simple ideas like whole/half notes playing a slow countermelody below the strings, or even a fanfare above the strings while the first violin plays melody would make your writing much more interesting.

Orchestration 15 25 Thank you for submitting a score. Your writing for the strings was interesting and had a lot of variety - read my comments above about the trumpet.
Composition 15 25

I didn't find the melodies very "memorable", but that isn't necessarily important in the scheme of things. It's what you do with them that counts, and you certainly painted a lot of very interesting imagery through the combination of your melodies and accompaniments. However, I think you should develop specific ideas more closely, just to give the work a stronger feel of cohesiveness.

Relevance 1.0 1.0 Completely relevant to the theme - went above and beyond in portraying the picture given.

By: Judge No. 2

Score: 70
Peer Evaluation

General

  1. Complexity - Interesting use of complexity. Can't say much there. It sounds a lot different from the actual score, so I don't know what to grade by, however, I did like the MIDI much more.

  2. Instrumentation - The instruments used for each part made the song sound very strange. I can't say I enjoyed it much, however, each instrument you used sounds unique, but that may be the soundfont.

  3. Composition - I am a bit lost at this point. I can hear each instrument harmonizing, but it didn't seem to flow well for me.

  4. Initial Inspiration - The song has a very eerie feeling to it. Like 'what is going on?' - I like that. When I first saw the picture, I thought to myself 'what is going on?' as well.

Specifics

  1. Opening - As it begins, I can already hear the eerie scene. Indeed strange.

  2. Middle - I don't know about this. I don't really know what to say, but it didn't spark my interest.

  3. Ending - As I was listening to the song, I had the whole song in repeat, but when it ended, the beginning played again, and I thought 'Is it supposed to continue?' I looked at the song and realized that the song had just ended. I don't see an ending.

I can't say I liked it, but it is a very unique.

From the composer of: Abysmal Flames

Score: 59

From the composer of: Affordable Wisdom

Score: 80
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Complexity 11 15

Without taking too much notion of the (not always very fitting, I might add) description, I can say I was pretty impressed by this work. Its ‘chaos’ was very appropriate and fitting to the theme and had an original approach as well: not the usual “Fear the mighty fire” approach, or the “Oh no! What about the poor forest?” approach, but more a paranoid “Who did this to us?!” approach, which did not seemed to fit any less than the formed ones. A downside might be the fairly straightforward use of the limited instruments used (for example no Pizzicato / Spiccato strings).

Orchestration 5 15
Composition 10 15
Appropriateness 17 20
Beginning/Start 4 5
Middle/Climax 4 5
Ending 4 5
Overall Opinion 15 20
Bonus/Malus

none given

 

From the composer of: Blisters

Score: 70
Firstly the title, I might have chosen a more appealing title if it were me.  I thought this combination of trumpets and strings will not sound well at all, and indeed it didn't. I would prefer this for a full orchestra production instead.

Discords are not suspenseful enough, with the exception of the introduction and (3:10 starting)

Introduction - a very consistently slow rhythm with little modification = static/boring which kills the music

until 2:20 min and beyond - not very ear-pleasing at all. Very static still

Around 3 min - somewhat nice melody for a few seconds but was kinda screwed later.

5:50 onwards - A more nicer sounding solo instrument is preferred.

The bass line at the end of the piece is annoying. Again here, a better accompaniment is preferred.

Overall, I gradually lost interest in hearing as the piece was progressing till the end. I would definitely say this not among the best out of the 12.
 
Criterion Pts. Total
Complexity 9 15
Orchestration 8 15
Composition 6 15
Appropriateness 13 20
Beginning/Start 4 5
Middle/Climax 2 5
Ending 1 5
Overall Opinion 12 20
Bonus/Malus
Uninteresting piece

-3

From the composer of: Fate of the Forest

Score: 52
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Complexity 16 20 At times, the harmonies you use are really nice, but (during) the second half of the piece, you get too bogged down (in) atonal "sludge," and it stops being enjoyable to listen to.
Orchestration 13 20 You stick faithfully to the typical melody + accompaniment setup, with the melody always (with) the trumpet or first violins.
Beginning 5 5 I really enjoy how the beginning sounds so peaceful and yet foreboding at the same time.
Middle 3 5 The section which begins at 2:30 is gorgeous, but why suddenly start implying tonal progressions after the fire's been discovered? And the weird shift to a pop/rock style is jarring and doesn't make sense musically.
Ending 1 5 Once the aforementioned "pop section" ends, there's really not anything left to the piece except for a few ambient melody lines.
Overall Composition Quality 20 25  
Appropriateness 14 20 To be honest, I find your program baffling. The beginning sets an appropriate mood, yes. But why does this beautiful trumpet melody start playing when they're searching for someone to blame for the fire? Why does the music only become convincingly agitated once the deer leave the fire behind at the end? You seem to be playing up some weird psychological undercurrent, and I don't think that's wholly kosher, based on the picture.

From the composer of: Forest Fire: A Brief Tone Poem for Orchestra

Score: 72

I enjoyed the smaller instrumentation for this piece, although I wish the strings would have had a more prominent role.  I would have liked to hear the strings provide more than just chords underneath the trumpet.  I don’t recall hearing a main motif.  In a way this piece almost sounds atonal, in that I hear no emphasized pitch over any others.  The use of pizzicato was an effective contrast.

The supplied program was more (of) a hindrance to my listening experience than it was an aid.  While a general description of what the music is conveying is fine, the marking of specific times in the music that correspond to events is not something I agree with.  In my opinion, programs help the music express its meaning, instead of the music doing so by itself.  I feel the music should be able to do this without the need of a program.  I believe if the program were not present I would not have been able to connect this music with a forest. 

As it was, even with the program telling me exactly what to listen for, I failed to make this connection.  I heard no fire, and I had difficulty being convinced that this music portrayed the thoughts of the animals seeing their home destroyed.

Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 75 100
Appropriateness Lever 0.6 1.0

From the composer of: Inferno

Score: 45
Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 83 100
Appropriateness Lever 1.0 1.0

From the composer of: Of Desperation, Death, and Hope

Score: 83
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Relevance 8 10

Fairly relevant. The program notes, while quite annoying, did help identify. Funny though how the most relevant part was in the part about “was it teenagers?” not “what a huge fire?”. In general it lacked the kind of chaos I’d expect in a fire – I could see your reasoning so I didn’t dock, but I feel that the overall feel was missed in places. Your notes really didn’t make sense at points with the music – especially the end. I didn’t see how the end was really relevant, but I suppose that is up to the composer.

Orchestration 8.5 10 Quite well done. It is clear that the composer knows what he is doing with strings and trumpet. At times it felt as if the strings got a little bit difficult in their parts, but overall well done. I question the use of a solo in the beginning violin – I’m not sure It’d cut over the p-level strings, I would switch those to a pp or change the solo to mp. Still, not much to say here – a solid job. Well done.
Overall Effect 16.5 20 While impressive, I didn’t really feel this piece. Something about the program notes rubbed me the wrong way to begin, and then I felt that sometimes the author was stretching to make the piece relevant. The composition was good but nothing stuck with me afterward – this is personal preference speaking, though. It is obvious that the composer is skilled in their work. I feel they should work on their form in the piece – try to get the highs higher – the lows were low enough. If that makes sense, good. A job well done.

From the composer of: Prelude for Solo Piano

Score: 88
Criterion Pts. Total
Complexity 10 15
Orchestration 9 15
Composition 8 15
Appropriateness 12 20
Beginning 2 5
Middle/Climax 2 5
Ending 2 5
Overall Opinion 10 20
Bonus/Malus

none given

From the composer of: Tell Me About The Forest

Score: 55
Technical Elements [48/60]:
  • Harmony: Very good. This is the strongest element of your compositional style. I appreciated the melancholic feel of this piece. I really hear a strong influence by composers such as Prokofiev and Shostakovich.
  • Development: Well, there was some reuse of ideas and a noticeable feel in terms of continuity. Still, I didn’t notice a conscious effort to develop the material within the work. I did particularly enjoy the effective transitions. There is potential here.
  • Orchestration: Good job actually writing for real instruments. You were one of the few composers who did. Overall, you didn’t make use of all the coloristic capabilities of your ensemble, but the writing looked to be idiomatic especially with the lyric melodies for (the) trumpet. Your player didn’t have much trouble playing the lines.
  • Form: The idea of following a program is nice. Overall, the mood of the piece doesn’t change enough to reflect the varied moods specified by the program. Still, having the tempo changes was a very nice idea.

Musicality [10/20]:

  • There are some interesting things that happen but overall, the piece is lacking in content.

Relevance [15/20]:

  • The program is directly related to the theme of the picture, but the mood isn’t quite as chaotic as what might be expected.

Overall Thoughts [B / Good]. The piece works on a formal and harmonic level but it lacks ideas. Your ideas aren’t strong, i.e. the melodic content isn’t particularly interesting or strong. The shapes tend to be a bit flat. If you had spent more time coming up with good ideas rather than rush composing at the last minute, you may (have been) able to come up with something that would surprise you and everybody else. For what it’s worth, this piece turned out well.

From the composer of: The Dance of the Clumsy Bear

Score: 73
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Overall Evaluation 60 100

Sounds too unstructured to me; orchestration is not the best.

Appropriateness Lever 0.6 1.0

I haven't the "fire"-feeling, which I have had in other pieces.

From the composer of: The Wildfire Suite

Score: 36

You will need to install the free Sibelius Scorch plugin to view Sibelius files.

Back Home Next

from 04/29/2008

© 2005-2006 by ZergrinchAll mistakes and omissions are belong to me.