The Dance of the Clumsy Bear
Back Home Next

Composed by: Paul Levasseur

Length: 5:06

   

Composer's Notes When evaluating the piece, please look at the score, because it adds clarity when studying the music.

This work focuses on one of the denizens of the forest in question. His day begins as a typical bear day would transpire, a gentle stroll through the woods. When confronted with the inevitability of a forest fire, Mr. Bear heads for the plains below, we aware of the dangers that fire presents. This event is depicted by the shift in harmonies into the Locrian mode and then into the wholetone scale. When the danger has been averted, the harmonies in the tuba part shift back into the more conventional church modes.

Of course, while the mood of impending doom is palpable, there is not a sense of uncontrolled panic since wildlife have an uncanny ability to sense and avoid natural disasters in a way which baffles humankind.

Compositionally, one must understand the instruments which are being employed in an ensemble such as this. First of all, Tubas and piano DO NOT blend. This means that a heterophonic texture must be adopted.  Secondly, there is not a balance issue between Tuba and Piano. The tuba is ALWAYS louder than the piano and I tried to capture this in my sequencer realization of this piece.

As for formal implications, I adopted a ternary type form, "A B A" in which the material from the beginning is stated once again at the end although it is varied upon.  Harmonically, this piece is quasi tonal and relies on many twentieth century practices such as diatonic clusters, chromaticism, bitonality and rhythmic flexibility to achieve the effect. In spite of this Avant Garde style the piece still retains the traditional function of melody and harmony, the dissonances being merely decorative in function.

Peer Review Notes Composition is a very personal thing. It is essentially an expression of who we are as artists and as creators and as such is a difficult thing to judge or assign a grade to. However, this is something that has to be done.

First of all, I’d like to congratulate all the entrants on a job well done. I am impressed with how the overall quality of the entries is quite high which should make the grading quite an enjoyable experience.  I’d like to make it clear that the purpose of my critique will be to
expose weaknesses in compositional technique while pointing out strengths in your writing. This does NOT mean I think you are a bad composer, I’m only trying to help. In the end, my goals with this review is to provide constructive feedback designed to help everybody improve as composers so please bear this in mind when reading what I have to say.

As for my grading scheme, I’m going to award 60% of the grade for compositional technique, 20% for musicality and 20% for relevance. My personal conviction is that this is a composition competition so the works should stand alone from a technical and musical standpoint, not requiring a program to ‘prop them up’ compositionally.

Critical Evaluation
Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 90 100
Appropriateness Lever 0.8 1.0

Didn’t Bartok write a Dance for a Drunken Bear? Anyway it’s harder writing truly amusing music than something terribly serious. So full marks on that point at least. The melodies aren’t quite hummable enough (rather closer to Hindemith than Bartok perhaps), but they are getting there. And btw, the piece is NOT in the least avant garde! What however this piece has to do with a forest fire I’m not sure. Perhaps Mr Bear started the fire when he dropped his lighter whist having a surreptitious cigarette away from Mrs Bear? Have a look at the Vaughan Williams Tuba Concerto and you’ll see that the tuba can sing equally as well as acting the buffoon. Good piece!

By: wobbie

Score: 72
Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 67 100
Appropriateness Lever 0.6 1.0

I see no bear in the picture!…READ THE QUESTION….but that aside, which instrument represents the bear with its clumsiness, the piano or the Tuba? The lack of syncopation or cross metres was what I missed here, and I had difficulty deciding who was who, even though it would be normal to give the bear to the Tuba. The harmonies were not at all dissonant, at least not by my standards, I know a composer who said that if he wanted to, he could write a chord that would give you a heart attack. All the unresolved notes seemed to resolve very easily and the integrity of the piece was good, it is a pity you promised things which I didn’t hear. Of course the Tuba doesn’t blend with the piano - no instrument does except another piano, and that is precisely the point of two different instruments playing with each other. The composer has to try and use the contrast to create a unified whole and unfortunately for you that is exactly what you did.

By: Judge No. 1 (See Notes)

Score: 40
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Complexity 45 50

The level of complexity is very good - complex to the point of being interesting without being overdone. I thoroughly enjoyed your use of 20th century techniques, particularly your use of tone clusters, which always seemed to be used in the right spots for comical effect. However, I would have made the piano part a bit more complex - some more inner melodies and traditional effects (like arpeggios) might have given it a bit more power. Your writing for tuba was lovely.

Orchestration 20 25 You used both instruments well, though I would have preferred more work the piano - but you seem to know what you wanted to do, and that is what is most important.
Composition 20 25

Very well done. All around, this is a very good composition, filled with humor and interesting melodies. Of course there was much variety in your harmonies. However, there was a point where parts of the piece began to feel monotonous, and this could probably be fixed if you worked on your piano part, as I have stated already. Good work.

Relevance 1.0 1.0

Relevant to the theme given.

By: Judge No. 2

Score: 85
Peer Evaluation

General

  1. Complexity - I don't really hear the same thing twice, I thought that was nicely done a bit. Not entirely though.

  2. Instrumentation - The only song with bending notes, which makes this song unique in it's own way. The piano just felt awkward at some points of the song, like it was almost random, or somewhat had a mind of it's own, almost.

  3. Composition - The piano is evil. The tuba is bizarre, almost seems unknown on what's going on next. There was some parts where the tuba and piano cooperated so well together.

  4. Initial Inspiration - I can smell the forest, but what is happening? I don't think this really depicts the picture well.

Specifics

  1. Opening - When I first listened to the song, I thought to myself, another piano solo, but the tuba snuck up on me. My first thought was about how funny it was.  I was reminded of a bear who did everything wrong, no matter how he tried, and this was incorporated by your title.

  2. Middle - Towards this point, I didn't know what was going on. I just continued to listen and listen, and it felt all over the place, I don't know what's going on though. It was a bit dull to listen to, however there were some good parts I liked.

  3. Ending - A slow and mellow ending. It has me thinking, 'what just happened?' Strange, yet good.

This song has some sense of comedic gold in it, however, the picture seems to represent more intensity, sadness, or chaos within it.

From the composer of: Abysmal Flames

Score: 54

From the composer of: Affordable Wisdom

Score: 90
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Complexity 14 15

Not that I will include bonus points for the title, but I have to mention it’s absolutely great. As for the piece, though it’s unconventional nature (quasi-tonality), it’s still very hummable and rather easy to listen too. Orchestration is limited, but the composer showed a great knowledge and skill of composing a piece for piano and tuba with varying techniques (as far as I can tell) and certain contrasts. Its form is logical and makes it easy to listen to, it has a beginning and a tail, which is something I like. Themes are introduced, developed and ended in a proper way. The appropriateness, however, is the thing this piece lacks. It’s not totally inappropriate and the piece describes the situation sketched by the composer very well, but the piece might have had emphasized more on the picture than the composer’s imagination for a more appropriate result. I like the scene given to us by the composer, but if I try to judge objectively, this piece does not seem to be very suitable when looking at the original picture. In the end, this piece is still a winner to me.

Orchestration 14 15
Composition 14 15
Appropriateness 7 20
Beginning/Start 5 5
Middle/Climax 4 5
Ending 5 5
Overall Opinion 19 20
Bonus/Malus

+5

For the title and the creative, but not entirely fitting, approach to the theme.

From the composer of: Blisters

Score: 88
I recognize the difficulty involved in this piece. Quite impressive, with the piano and tuba together.  Has development, nice melodies, nice blending of instruments which fit the title of the piece.  The piano could be more dramatic in the 4:00 min or whenever possible. I felt it was too soft. But then I could be wrong, because I am not experienced with orchestration.

However, if i bring back this piece to the situation/mood shown in the picture, it does not fit very well.
 
Criterion Pts. Total
Complexity 13 15
Orchestration 12 15
Composition 11 15
Appropriateness 14 20
Beginning/Start 4 5
Middle/Climax 4 5
Ending 4 5
Overall Opinion 17 20
Bonus/Malus
Doesn't fit into the mood very well

-2

From the composer of: Fate of the Forest

Score: 77
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Complexity 19 20 I love your harmonic sensibility! The chords you used are strange, but at the same time perfectly logical. There are times when it devolves from tasteful dissonance to what seems to be discord for its own sake, but these moments are very rare (and become rarer on repeated listenings, which is the mark of great music in my mind).
Orchestration 20 20 Although you used a (very) small ensemble, you utilized it extraordinarily well. You avoided the obvious amateur move of giving the melody to the tuba and having the piano vamp, instead (of) allowing each instrument to play off the other and use their full wealth of abilities; much of the time the tuba is neither melody nor accompaniment, but merely color, which is a particularly nice touch.
Beginning 5 5 The first three measures are a real treat - the first two measures imply a I-IV progression in C, but the piece instantly switches to F the moment the right hand starts playing (although, of course, all semblance of traditional tonality is done away with immediately after).
Middle 4 5 The section at 1:45 kills the piece's momentum, but it quickly recovers when it returns to the minor-key version of the opening tuba melody. The section at 3:00 also has a similar problem, but 3:20-3:53 is possibly the best part of the piece.
Ending 4 5 The recapitulation does a great job of making the themes feel new without changing them drastically, I felt as if the code could have used a little more punch. You do a great job at sustaining direction throughout the piece, so the lack of buildup toward the end makes it feel like it goes out with a whimper (albeit a fortississimo whimper) than the bang it demands.
Overall Composition Quality 24 25 An excellent piece of work with only a few dull moments, and well-structured without being predictable.
Appropriateness 12 20 Here's where I felt something was really lacking. While the first three minutes or so do sound like a bear traipsing about the woods and then realizing something is amiss, the piece doesn't provide a conclusion to the story. Plus, no bears in the picture.

From the composer of: Forest Fire: A Brief Tone Poem for Orchestra

Score: 88

Clearly tuba is the best choice when depicting something clumsy and bear-like.  I think this piece did an extravagant job of portraying the hike of a bear through the forest.  It was lilting and leaning, never establishing a key, but never atonal, and always hearing that recurring motif.  I enjoyed the references to the modal scales.  The provided PDF score was fun to follow along with as well.

I question this piece’s relevance to a picture containing devastating fire.  If the picture showed us a bear, perhaps I’d enjoy this interpretation more, but what does this piece have to do with a raging forest fire?  I’m having difficulty trying to make the connection.  If I heard this composition without knowing its origin, I most certainly would envision a bear, but I would have no idea that it came from a forest fire picture.

Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 90 100
Appropriateness Lever 0.65 1.0

From the composer of: Inferno

Score: 59
Criteria Pts. Total

Comments

Setting 2 10

It sounds like a clumsy bear, waking up from hibernation. Not a forest fire.

Composition 8 10

There is plenty of development, thematic presentation and some great harmonies here.

Orchestration 6 10

The tuba is not the instrument to use when composing for a forest fire. But besides that, the interplay between the two instruments is very well-done.

Overall Score 6 10

This does not seem like the correct competition for this piece.

From the composer of: Music for Trumpet and Strings

Score: 55
Criterion Pts. Total
Overall Evaluation 80 100
Appropriateness Lever 0.7 1.0

From the composer of: Of Desperation, Death, and Hope

Score: 56
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Relevance 6 10

I just could not give relevance points here. For one, there are no bears in the picture, there are deer. The piece did not really seem to indicate a forest fire. Not much else to say – props to the liner notes (a good bullshitting exercise) but really, not relevant. However, this does NOT mean it’s not a good piece.

Orchestration 9.5 10 The strongest scorer in its category. It is clear that the composer has put a lot of work into making an accurate and well written piece that is really There isn’t much to say here besides BRAVO.
Overall Effect 19 20 An extremely well-written piece that has no relevance really creates a dilemma. In this case, I chose to score it very well in all categories except relevance. No hard feelings, I hope. An excellent piece.

From the composer of: Prelude for Solo Piano

Score: 86
Criterion Pts. Total
Complexity 12 15
Orchestration 14 15
Composition 12 15
Appropriateness 9 20
Beginning 3 5
Middle/Climax 2 5
Ending 2 5
Overall Opinion 12 20
Bonus/Malus

none given

From the composer of: Tell Me About The Forest

Score: 66
Criterion Pts. Total

Comments

Overall Evaluation 60 100

Overall good, I would say, but I don't like that much dissonance.

Appropriateness Lever 0.7 1.0

It doesn't match directly with the picture, I would say, but with some imagination, (this could come) with the situation of a wildfire

From the composer of: The Wildfire Suite

Score: 42

You will need to install the free Sibelius Scorch plugin to view Sibelius files.

Back Home Next

from 04/29/2008

© 2005-2006 by ZergrinchAll mistakes and omissions are belong to me.